College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Man vs. Fat Sandwiches

Host attempts feat at Grease Trucks

By Heather Brookhart

Metro Editor

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Jeff Lazaro

Jeff Lazaro

About 100 students skipped class, stood on flower planters, cars and the Grease Trucks yesterday to catch a glimpse of Travel Channel host Adam Richman as the network filmed an episode of the series, “Man v. Food” at the RU Hungry Grease Truck on the College Avenue campus.
Richman attempted to take the “Fat Sandwich Challenge” — eating five fat sandwiches in 45 minutes, which RU Hungry Grease Truck Owner Ayman Elnaggar said has been attempted by about 250 people in the last five years. Of them, 16 were successful, he said.
As the tradition goes, if a person can finish five fat sandwiches within the given time limit, a new sandwich gets named after the challenger.
“It’s a great thing to give people the opportunity to create their own sandwiches,” Elnaggar said. “I strongly believe if we [are a] success, it’s Rutgers students’ success [also].”
Many of the onlookers in the crowd said they were avid fans of the show and enthusiastic that the host could finish the sandwiches.
“I think he can do it, I’ve seen some crazy stuff, I think he’s got this,” said School of Arts and Sciences first-year student Eric Mann.
School of Arts and Sciences junior Tom Nucum said he came out to watch the filming of “Man v. Food” because he watches the show religiously.
“It’s a challenge that I’ve never actually seen attempted,” he said. “It’s good to see someone take it down, and hopefully in the future I can eat a ‘Fat Adam.’”
School of Arts and Sciences senior Stephen Kropa said he saw Richman last Saturday outside of the Homecoming game.
“It was really fun to see him walking around, and I’ve been saying it for years he should come here and do this challenge,” Kropa said.
A crowd of University students formed a circle around Richman while he filmed the introduction to the challenge.
Among those in the crowd was Darrell Butler, the namesake of the “Fat Darrell” sandwich.
Butler, a 1998 University alumnus, said when he was a college student, there was only one kind of sandwich — the “Fat Cat.”
Tired of eating the “Fat Cat,” Butler said he made a special request to the Grease Trucks one night.
“What I wanted the whole week was chicken fingers, mozzarella sticks [and] fries, but separately [that] would have cost $10 or $12, [and I] didn’t have $10 or $12,” he said. “But I did have enough for a ‘Fat Cat.’”
Butler said he asked the employees at the Grease Trucks if they could make a sandwich like the “Fat Cat,” but with the aforementioned ingredients. He said the next 10 people that were in line behind him ordered the same thing, and the truck sold 50 “Fat Darrells” that first night.
“It’s been the number one seller since,” Butler said.
He said he has been on other TV shows on the Food Network and the Travel Channel, such as “Extreme Pig Outs.” Butler said he was there yesterday to coach Richman through the challenge.
“We have a strategy going; he’s trying to pick things that aren’t [too heavy]. … He’s going to get something a little thinner, so he should be able to pull this off,” he said. “He hasn’t eaten all day, he’s been training for it, so he should be good.”
As Richman finished the sandwiches, Elnaggar ran them out to him from the Grease Trucks one by one, still hot from the kitchen.
Elnaggar said the Travel Channel also came to the Grease Trucks to film a different show last year but there was not a large crowd turnout because it was during winter break.
Despite students not being present at last year’s filming, he said the episode’s airing helped bring in a lot of business.
“It feels real good that our food can be on a Rutgers campus,” Elnaggar said. “It feels like a family and mom’s kitchen.”
Despite cheers and shouts from the crowd encouraging Richman to take “one more bite,” after consuming four fat sandwiches, the host exceeded the 45-minute time limit and failed to complete the challenge.
Students stayed after the challenge to ask Richman questions on camera as part of the “press conference” portion of the episode. The host also took photos and signed autographs with students.
The New Jersey episode of “Man v. Food,” will premiere on Dec. 9 on the Travel Channel, according to their official Web site.

Comments

29 comments
JC
Sat Nov 7 2009 07:46
To: Student
I'll look forward to reading the Targum the day before Thanksgiving, on which there are classes. I'm sure it will be a remarkable issue.
Student
Fri Oct 16 2009 15:05
To JC:
The Targum runs only when it "isn't a hassle?" Check the "About Us" section: "The Daily Targum is published Monday through Friday in New Brunswick, N.J., while classes are in session during the fall and spring semesters."
The only time the Targum does not run is when there are no official classes, such as during finals and holidays. But if there is class, then there is a Targum. Also, they do run special summer issues. I hardly think publishing daily means they work only when it is convenient for them ...
JC
Thu Oct 15 2009 16:58
All newspapers are going downhill, so the Targum is not in some special situation. Back in the 80s the Targum was a more responsible paper, being there for its audience whether it was convenient or not. They published during exams, and a few times in the summer. Now they only publish when it isn't a hassle to do so. Day before Thanksgiving? Too much trouble... exams... sorry we have to cram and put our sacred responsibility to our public on hold. Again, this attitude is at most "news"papers now.
Broseph
Thu Oct 15 2009 15:08
Its easy to say things like its not doing that well and such, but as a College student I'd expect you to point out specific instances where the writing or coverage is lacking. Also, remember, mistakes like typos or grammar do not make for a bad paper since all national newspapers have issues such as these. So, go on. What would you have the coverage be about if given the chance?
Oh, and I agree. The opinions section is pretty terrible.
Joe O.
Thu Oct 15 2009 12:04
The Targum has definitely lost the bit of zest it had a couple of years ago. Sure, I can stomach (no pun) a story on a TV show host downing a bunch of sandwiches at our distinctive Grease Trucks but I expect the rest of the paper to have some substance and decent writing. I don't blame the writers - I blame their editors who ought to know better. At this point, I don't see why the Targum should remain a daily paper. Take it to three printings a week (M,W,F) so the writers and editors can come up with some more original material. Oh, and get rid of the editorial staff.
JC
Wed Oct 14 2009 18:28
I don't know if Darrel Butler was misquoted, but there were several Fat sandwiches before the Fat Darryl, including the Fat Sam, Fat Moon, and Fat Koko.
JC
Wed Oct 14 2009 18:24
Geez, they were in a public place. The press has a right to cover it. It's called the first amendment. Try taking an American history course, lawyer boy. Then try getting a life
brendan
Wed Oct 14 2009 18:07
I made my own fat sandwhich before... fat brendan at Mr. C's truck... try it out. MVF is a good show, but i'd molliwhop him.
Andrew
Wed Oct 14 2009 16:41
ATTN: MvF is better than YOU, and Karcass

The only way it would be "not doing your jobs" would be if the Daily Targum signed an Non-disclosure Agreement, and guess what, you can't have an NDA for something that occurs in a public place. Not only that, but if the Daily Targum were to write "BUT YOU HAVE TO WATCH AND SEE IF HE WINS," that would be BLATANT editorializing, and this was a news story, not something on the editorial page. So, on that account, you're wrong, the job couldnt have actually been done any better. The Daily Targum objectively reported what happened. A secret was let out? Boo-hoo. Tons of facebook statuses referred to his unsuccessful attempt at the challenge before the Daily Targum published a single thing about it, so you should probably send them all friend requests and comment on their statuses so they too can find out that you know where the caps lock button is.

On the subject of legal recourse, the travel channel doesnt exactly have any ground to stand on even if they were to pursue it, (and they won't, because they dont actually give a crap), mostly because you can't sue someone for writing about something that happened in a public place (hint: first amendment).

Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 14:40
Whoever covered this article, besides for having the common sense not to divulge information related to a non-yet-aired TV broadcast, clearly didn't listen to the endless and excessive pleas from every single member on the production staff to not speak of the outcome of the event in any way - on facebook and twitter, let alone published news media - even going as far as to imply legal repercussions to those who disobeyed. If you get a call from their legal department, don't be surprised...
andrew wk
Wed Oct 14 2009 14:20
man versus food was picked up by local news sources in the past and they ran all of them. go look it up, its no big deal
it's not even a good show
Chris
Wed Oct 14 2009 13:01
youre all going to watch it anyway, it will be a good episode
Karcass
Wed Oct 14 2009 12:42
Wow, the crew and producers definately said multiple times that the result of this challenge should not be told. Further, they asked that students not take pictures during the filming of this challenge. It was a great experience to watch and take part of... but if they do not air this episode because the "fat secret" was let out of the bag... shame on you! The article isn't written poorly, just the fact that you let out the secret to the world. NJ.com has picked it up also. Your paper IS followed... they quote the Targum as the main source on NJ.COM (the star ledger, which is one of the top 20 circulated newspapers in the country)
Targum Reader
Wed Oct 14 2009 12:07
Dear Belligerent Reader,
A T.V. Show isn't bigger than an institution of Higher Learning. A man eating five fat sandwiches is definitely not bigger than "our" college. If you feel that way, get out. Go transfer to a college with a bigger football program, because obviously you didn't come here to learn.

Ryan and Holder,
Glad you can pontificate about what's news and how to cover an event. If you're such experts maybe you should go work for the Targum to make it better instead of complaining about how bad it is. No doubt you will reply that important people(!) such as yourselves have better things to do than work for the Targum. If it's so bad and you don't care enough to make it better, then why still read?

JT
Wed Oct 14 2009 12:04
Pretty sure they made it clear several times that they did not want the ending of the challenge revealed. So yeah.....
Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:59
I understand that you shouldn't release the ending, that was a HUGE mistake. It could definitely affect whether or not the show airs. Besides that, why the hell is everyone shi**ing on this paper. It is an awesome event at the school, the show is extremely popular and will provide national attention. Not only that but I have seen much worse articles written in more popular papers, get off your high horses bitches. If you have such a problem with it go out and make a difference instead of whinning about it like a little girl who just dropped her ice cream.
J James
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:51
didnt the fat koko, fat moon, etc exist prior to 1998? why is this dude taking credit for sandwitches that already existed but were named something different..
Linda
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:43
Awh, too bad, would have liked to see him succeed!

Why are people hating on the Targum for this story? They have done a nice job covering local and state issues - EON, the governor campaign - and of course they're going to cover events like this one at the University...because they are a paper that serves the University community. If you're not interested in things beyond going to your classes and riding the buses, then just don't read the Targum and go on your merry way. Hateful words aren't very kind, especially since I'm sure you couldn't do a better job...

C hill out
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:36
And there is no such word as "REDICULOUS."
traceyl
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:33
It's a fun, human interest story...






log out