College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

New group files petition for city unification

By Mary Diduch

Associate News Editor

Print this article

Published: Monday, August 31, 2009

Updated: Saturday, September 5, 2009

By Dan Bracaglia / Associate Photography Editor

Dan Bracaglia / Associate Photography Editor

Thomas Peoples, an elected democratic committeeman for 4th Ward, District 5, discusses the need for wards at a July 14 public forum. Mayor Jim Cahill addressed the need to evaluate all possible alternatives for representation.

Empower Our Neighborhoods is no longer the only group seeking to change the structure of New Brunswick's City Council.
 
A new group, Unite New Brunswick, announced yesterday they have submitted a petition to the city clerk on Aug. 24 with 1,000 signatures to add another question to the Nov. 3 ballot to increase the city council from five to seven members, all elected at-large.
 
This question differs from EON’s, asking voters to choose a system where six wards elect one representative each, in addition to electing three representatives at-large.
 
“The idea and the sentiment from a lot of residents is that [New Brunswick has] grown so much under this system,” said Kyle Kirkpatrick, a member of Unite New Brunswick’s Committee of Petitioners. “The town has been revitalized, crime has dropped [and] the unemployment rate is the lowest in New Jersey. It’s quite literally the fastest-growing urban center in New Jersey.”
 
He said the idea behind UNB is to keep the progress going and not switch to a system that could promote division.
 
“The mayor is pleased that if the city clerk certifies this new petition, there will be another option for New Brunswick residents to consider on Election Day, and choice is a good thing,” said City Spokesman Bill Bray. “The mayor is also happy that the discussion and debate regarding the form of government that will best serve the residents of this city — which otherwise would have been provided by the proposed charter study commission — will now continue … it is very important that voters examine both of these options, become informed of both of these options’ advantages and disadvantages and choose wisely this November.”
 
With EON’s success in court to have their petition approved, the city’s former idea of creating a Charter Study Commission to evaluate all types of representation was not allowed to be placed on the ballot this year, but their proposal allows for more debate, said Glenn Fleming, a member of UNB’s Committee of Petitioners.
 
But EON has been trying to have this debate for a long time, said EON President Martha Guarnieri.
 
“They’ve just been keeping us in court,” she said.
 
Kirkpatrick said with the at-large system, citizens have the ability to vote for all of their representatives, not just four with the ward system, and this allows representatives to be aware of the interests of all.
 
“There’s been a lot of information about wards going out there, some of which we disagree with and think might not be practical or accurate,” he said. “And there’s some information that people don’t know about at-large systems.”
 
Ezra Rufino, a member of UNB’s Committee of Petitioners, said increasing the number of members relieves some of the burden of the individual council members.
 
Guarnieri said there is wide support for the ward question, and ward representation allows specific issues to receive more attention. New Brunswick’s diversity also calls for representatives sensitive to each neighborhood.
 
“With a ward system, you have to be held accountable by the people that you live by or you won’t be re-elected,” she said.
 
The same people run for the at-large system every year, said EON member Jordan Bucey.
“There’s only been opposition three times in the last decade, and those people lost because they don’t have the money that these people have,” she said. “With this, every neighborhood gets a vote.”
 
Rufino said that is a part of democracy.
 
“It’s really about if the citizens of New Brunswick want to vote someone out of the council, then they will have the option for [new] council members. You’re always presented with the option to get rid of someone or add someone new,” said Rufino, a Rutgers College senior.
The city has a 20-day period to confirm the signatures and announce whether the question will be on the ballot.
 
Bennet Zurofsky, a lawyer who has represented EON in the past, does not expect this petition to pass.
 
“I expect the city clerk to apply the law as it has been applied by the two judges,” he said.
It is not possible for multiple proceedings regarding a change of government to be pending for the same ballot, Zurofsky said. Since EON has already filed a proceeding for the upcoming election, as on Aug. 10, Judge James P. Hurley ruled that City Clerk Dan Torrisi must honor EON’s petition to place their question on the ballot.
 
Fleming said if their question is not placed on the November ballot, they would still continue their campaign in future elections.
 
“We’re not a one-time deal … this isn’t something we haphazardly did,” he said. “Whatever we have to do, we will.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Concerned Student
Tue Sep 1 2009 17:24
The at-large system has not done anything for students so far. Parking tickets are still given out in ridiculous numbers through the 6th ward, streets are still a mess, there is no system to allow RU students to communicate with New Brunswick High School (which has an abysmal graduation rate for being a couple of miles from Rutgers), and slum landlords still exploit and steal from students on the regular. We are a colony that is not self-governed.

I'm not sure what is more insulting - the STUDENT newspaper bending over to the whims of Bill Bray and Mayor Cahill, or this fake group calling themselves "grassroots."

Any student who does not support wards just wants to end up like all the other hacks in City Hall shoveling stolen money into their pockets. Wake up, students! There is no justice for us without wards.

jonny
Tue Sep 1 2009 16:45
EON has shown itself to bee the same self-righteous blowhards that run that ridiculous Tent State, camping out and forming drum circles to keep tuition low great idea. The City has done a great job working on student issues. Rockoff Hall, Mason Gross/ Bloustien School, University Center, Rutgers Public Safety Building, Brunsquick Shuttle and the soon to start Gateway Building are just a few things that would not have been possible without the leadership from City Hall. If I'm stuck in a student ward, then every student issue looses in a 8-to-1 vote at City Council.
Mitt
Tue Sep 1 2009 16:31
The idea that students would have a greater voice on council through a ward system would prove untrue. Actually, they would probably be outnumbered (even IF all of the at-large representatives voted in their favor) by the surrounding neighborhoods/wards. Simply put, there would be LESS of the council representing the student population--it's impossible, on the other hand, for an at-large council to ignore the Rutgers community because it's such an important component of our city as a whole.
Mike
Tue Sep 1 2009 00:44
The ward system is the best way to help students have a voice. Under the current 5 member at-large system the student communities are ignored and their votes are drowned out by the rest of the city. In effect a quarter of the city goes completely unrepresented. Expanding to a 7 member at-large system does nothing to change that. Only the ward based system, under which students can choose a councilperson from their community, gives students the chance to have their voice heard in city hall.
Matt
Tue Sep 1 2009 00:37
The Targum's city reporting has always been an empty shill for the New Brunswick democratic machine, but this is an astounding new low. I'm not sure which is worse, the Targum's practice of printing barely-edited press releases straight off of Jim Cahill's desk or the Targum's turgid half-literate original reporting. The very notion that this is a petition for "unification" is baffling--the committee of petitioners is an obvious bunch of stooges for the NB Democratic machine. Their direct goal is suppression of political dissent and minority voices, all of which threaten their absolute hold on power. The Targum's failure to call out this petition for the fraud it is yet again demonstrates their disconnectedness from the city and it's people.






log out