College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

RUSA to ‘retreat’ with $20K in student fees

By Cagri Ozuturk

Associate News Editor

Print this article

Published: Thursday, September 24, 2009

Updated: Thursday, September 24, 2009

It was an active night for the student fees budget of the Rutgers University Student Assembly yesterday, as student leaders approved three special events that cost more than $11,000 each and discussed the value of a $20,000 allocated for a special retreat.
“There was intense debate, but … no one took anything personally,” Assembly Chair Werner Born said at the meeting, held in the Student Activities Center on the College Avenue campus. “There were very important issues raised, but at the end of the day, we will move forward with everything as planned.”
The retreat is a part of the assembly’s attempts to build better relationships between members, said Internal Affairs Chair Josh Slavin, a Livingston College senior.
“Functioning relationships between members is essential to student government,” Slavin said. “We’ve tried on-campus activities, and it did not foster the type of relationships we want to see between people that will work together in three-hour meetings for the entire year. It’s the best way to get students excited about student government.”
The retreat was already contracted with the camp “Happiness is Camping” when University Affairs Chair Ben West and Representative Chris Salloum proposed the resolution to forbid the assembly to spend more than $5,000, but it was not voted upon. 
Some of the money for the retreat will be donated to a children’s cancer foundation by the camp.
“The reason I opposed the $20,000 retreat for RUSA is because we had a huge discussion about all these other events that are attended by 800 to 900 students,” West said. “I don’t think we’re using this money as best as we can. We should be using this money for something more community action-based. We’re funding our own vacation, and it’s not fair to students because $20,000 equals one full-ride scholarship for one student for one year.”
The assembly attempted to close the retreat discussion to the public, which — after a miscount — did not pass with a 9-7 vote. Recording Secretary Meet Shah could not confirm who posed the idea because he said he did not write it down.
“When you listen to what they are talking … they’re using words like entice and excited,” Latino Student Council Assembly Representative Braulio Salas said. “These are student leaders and they shouldn’t have to feel enticed, excited and worrying about attendance.”
Last year, six councils had individual $5,000 retreats, each with its own budget. This year, $20,000 was allocated to the retreat, but it is expected to cost less based on how many members show up. Between about 150 members, this retreat will cost $121 per person.
“An on-campus retreat would save tons of money and still have the same effects,” Salas said. “We’re doing a disservice to the student body because we are supposed to be representing them; by signing a check for a retreat without telling anybody or discussing it publicly, we’re doing them a disservice.”
Three events allocating the student fees for events was another resolution that passed during the meeting.
The events approved were the Premedical Development Conference for $11,170; the Latin Gala, approved for $11,540; and Association of Indians at Rutgers’ Zamana, approved for $17,290; all of which totaled $40,000. All passed unanimously except for the Zamana event.
The events all require tickets from students to enter, and all proceeds will go to the organizer’s individual respective charities.
“Nothing against AIR,” said Vice Chair of the Assembly Payal Patel, an Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, who was the lone vote against the Zamana special event. “To give one cultural organization about $10,000 and then give another one of a similar magnitude in terms of attendance, $7,000 more seems unfair just because they want to have it at the State Theatre.”
She has performed with AIR for two years, so she knows the logistics of the event and thinks the State Theatre creates excessive spending when the Nicholas Music Center and other venues are also available, she said. 
In order to qualify for special event status, the event must meet two of four prerequisites: It must have a budget of more than $15,000 and expect more than 250 participants, be co-sponsored by five organizations, be an annual event and have 50 percent or more of its budget paid for from an outside source.
“We granted three different organizations special events status, which is great, which means there’s great events coming up,” Born said. “They are all traditional events that had great turnaround in the past, and we will move forward with our retreat as well.”
The Assembly Allocations Board had $40,000 to give out to special events, which is allocated every semester. If the organizations do not use all of the money for their events, they are required to give all the money back to be used for the next semester.
Members of the Allocations Board audit all special events for transparency, Born said. There are multiple members on the Allocations Board specifically to audit the 300 organizations funded from student fees.
Other resolutions that were passed at the event are the election guidelines for campus councils’ first-year student elections.
The next assembly meeting will feature Director of the Department of Transportation Services Jack Molenaar as a guest speaker.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

23 comments

Your name
Tue Sep 29 2009 12:35
Apathetic-- you are kind of making my point. It doesn't make sense to have the cultural seats, because you are going to have a million groups come out of the woodwork and demand representation. Jewish, not Jewish, whatever... It is a stupid system where some people are double represented, and some people cannot be.
Shocked
Sun Sep 27 2009 15:07
Ridic!
Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 23:42
WASTE OF MONEY
Apathetic
Fri Sep 25 2009 22:49
"Your name":
Ok, then, say I'm a homosexual Jewish Argentinian Engineering major living on College Ave, then I have 5 representations. Not much better and the point still stands.
If the "special population" or "cultural council" members had any interest in ethics or any idea what a conflict of interest was they would have abstained from voting on their own events. But they didn't, so the point still stands.
And I didn't say the retreat issue wasn't wrong either, that's also very wrong. Student leaders shouldn't have to go to retreats about something they said they were all so "enthused" about when they were giving their speeches to get elected.
Also, I'm not any of the people you think I am. I'm an actual student with the ability to think and consider ideas and philosophy that's not affiliated with any of these organizations. I have no agenda except to care about where my money is going. To add to your presumptiousness, I'm a member of a minority. Stop trying to marginalize me for actually thinking and not taking your word for it.
Crazy
Fri Sep 25 2009 22:00
RUSA - wasting money, doing nothing like usual. I can't believe that Werner Born, the Chair, wants to "move forward with everything as planned" when everyone thinks this is crazy!
Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 18:44
Its not all geographical - Engineering, Pharmacy, Mason Gross, and Business shools all have reps.

And why are we talking about this? The problem is student representatives closing meetings (it was actually Josh Slavin, who yelled out loud "why are we even discussing this" not Eric Kaplan) about a 20 K retreat to the public, and about the fact that RUSA is doing nothing but spending all that money on "member-only" events in far-away resorts instead of doing something for students. That's a major problem. Not events run that are open to all students and that enhance student life on campus, and that are run by organizations that actually function correctly and have members who care about what they do.

Stop using your issues with minorities to change the subject about what the problem really is: student leaders in RUSA who don't care and don't work.

Apathetic Student
Fri Sep 25 2009 17:51
That's all well and good but let's say I'm a politically active homosexual Argentinian that is of the Jewish faith that lives on-campus on College Avenue. I want RUSA to pass a resolution giving the organization I'm a part of special event status. Let's say they were feeling extra conservative and actually decided to discuss the worth of this special event. Technically, if I have an active position or a relationship with the higher positions of the Queer Caucus, Latino Student Council, Hillel House, and the College Avenue Campus Council, I'm represented by 4 councils. And if I have enough friends (especially since I'm active in all of these organizations) It's rather simple for me lobby and pass resolutions with all of these connections.
It's a farfetched scenario, sure, but do you guys understand the point of overrepresentation and why Congress doesn't have a special seat for minorities and "special" groups, that's why it's only geographical and not based on race, creed, gender, and etc.? This was why the Constitution was such a hot topic at last year's RUSA, because people didn't want problems like overrepresentation.
Eric Straub was right when he said RUSA was a suggestion box with $1.8 million in student fees in the bank, so why let emotions and lobbies run our student government and not philosophies and ideas? Or we can just keep giving out 5 figures to events that appeal to "traditionally underrepresented groups" and "would be pumped if more people showed up that dont have to be a part of our group."
Lumina
Fri Sep 25 2009 17:21
Thugs? Um...ok...

And I agree: religious groups should have a council. Most schools have a Interfaith/Multifaith Council on campus - that would serve as a good model. It doesn't seem to be too "exclusive" of a "club"...everyone from the gays to the engineers have a council.

You are right about the thugs who oppose umbrella groups though. I think that representatives/self-proclaimed philosopher-kings like Eric Kaplan have consistently expressed feelings against such groups, so, knowing how consistent he is in his opposition because he is so principled/holier-than-though, being unable to understand why some people identify more with organizations that they are a part of than campuses that they live on, he would probably oppose the creation of another important group just like he has opposed the creation of groups in the past (unless he is a bit hypocritical after all :)

Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 15:54
btw, I think other ethnic/religious groups that request seats should also be granted... not just Jewish
Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 15:46
Right, but why do certain ethnicities qualify and other ones don't? What is the distinction or the difference?

Hillel represents The Hillel Theater company, Kol Halayla, Mesorah, Koach, Kesher, Days Without Hate, FYI, Yiddish Club, Chug Ivrit, Israeli Dance club, Moving Up, Israel Committee, Social Arts Committee, Education Committee, Syrian Club, and the Russian Club to name a few. Is that not considered "umbrealla"? What's the difference? Why did you thugs turn it down for membership in your "exclusive" club last semester?

Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 14:44
m:
Its not Karen that comes up with these, its the executive board that decides where to go and all that.
Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 12:58
"In these tough economic times, why are student fees being used to fund parties for specific ethnic groups? These fees should not be used for special interest groups and should be used for the good of everyone. Either plan events that interest all students, regardless of ethinicity, or stop collecting these ridiculous fees!"

Agreed. Especially when some groups have already been discriminated at the end of last year when they applied. How come a group of ~500 student athletes got approved and a group of 5000 Jewish people didn't? What is the standard for being represented? It is really unclear and these special interest seats just don't make sense.

If this wasn't a discriminating and racially marginalizing group I wouldn't mind so much... also if they actually did anything that wasn't self-serving!

m
Fri Sep 25 2009 12:37
Yes. And it's already been approved - Karen Ardizonne has already spent the money on the retreat. Did she consult student leaders on this before dropping 20K of student fees? I bet not!

Any student government activity should be approved by student government BEFORE action is taken.

Aaron
Fri Sep 25 2009 10:13
People are going on vacation with my student fees? And I'm not even invited........ Not cool...... Anybody down to protest this if it's approved?
Cheryl
Fri Sep 25 2009 09:45
The argument that this is "the only way" to get student leaders to be on the same page or work together is ludicrous. I have been on one of these "Happiness is Camping" retreats, and as another commenter noted, it is 100% ice breakers, tree climbing, and zip-lining - fun times, but definitely not a necessity for getting our representatives (the people who worked to GET ELECTED to represent the students) to work together. It seems to me that with the attendance problems RUSA has, all of these "representatives" ran for office just to have something to write down on their resumes, rather than actually having any ambition to represent their constituents.

The most disgusting thing in this article by far, however, is the fact that our "representatives" tried to CLOSE THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC so that they could discuss this issue within their own elitist group without those pesky constituents/media listening to what they have to say.

Astonishing that last year the argument was that it was horrifying that students had to "jump through hoops" to get the $9.75 that they deserved back from the Targum, yet there is little discussion when fees that students have no way of getting back are being allocated to their own group.

Cassie
Fri Sep 25 2009 09:23
In these tough economic times, why are student fees being used to fund parties for specific ethnic groups? These fees should not be used for special interest groups and should be used for the good of everyone. Either plan events that interest all students, regardless of ethinicity, or stop collecting these ridiculous fees!
m
Fri Sep 25 2009 01:18
Student government has had retreats in the past. From my understanding, students reps do not even want to attend the retreat which is basically a weekend full of ice breakers and climbing trees. So, Rick, the retreat might have been "awesome" last year, but it sure didn't make RUSA motivated to do anything. Also, students choose to run for student government. Maybe putting up with painfully boring meetings ("all the junk student gov takes") is rough, but it is rough because YOU MAKE IT THAT WAY.

Here is my challenge to you, RUSA and Werner - do something. ANYTHING. It's gotta be for all students and it's gotta be tangible. Restore the faith of students in student government.

Zain
Fri Sep 25 2009 01:05
This 'retreat' is one for ALL campus councils. Originally in the past each campus council would have there own retreat and would be allocated a certain amount of money. To make things more efficient and to get all elected student leaders on the same page it is best to have one major retreat. It seems like a huge sum of money when its seen as just one organization going on a retreat, but honestly it involves ALL student councils and allows the entire student governing body to be on the same page. Look we are shaping the new Rutgers UNIVERSITY and if we continue to work divided our student government and our University as a whole will go no where. This retreat will allow all student councils to have a better understanding of how policies work.
Jenny K
Fri Sep 25 2009 00:56
Ben West is the only one who does anything in student government. The only thing radical about him is his work ethic. Have you checked out the work of his committee? His facebook group? His column? What's RUSA done? Exactly?
Your name
Fri Sep 25 2009 00:19
RUSA hasn't done anything for students in it's existence other than give us back our student fee money in the form of special funds. In regards to the retreat... if it means finally having a functional student government, it may be worth the investment. Of course, we can't even trust these bafoons to show up to anything, so...






log out