College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Tensions run high as RUSA discusses assisting Palestine Children’s Relief Fund

By Ariel Nagi

Associate News Editor

Print this article

Published: Friday, November 20, 2009

Updated: Friday, November 20, 2009

Tension and heated debate circled yesterday as the Rutgers University Student Assembly discussed a motion to reconsider a vote recently passed by RUSA allowing the University Chapter of the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund to have the rights to the semi-annual meal sign-away program.
Concerned University students and some RUSA members said that the PCRF, an international humanitarian group that provides Middle Eastern children affected by war with medical care, should not be allowed the right to the sign-away program because they are a highly political international group.
After each side spoke and answered questions for about 10 minutes, they were asked to conclude discussions. Following the meeting in the Rutgers Student Center on the College Avenue campus, the discussions turned contentious as members shouted outside room 411 of the student center.
Kerri Willson, associate director for Student Centers and Programs, tried to calm both sides but they continued to hotly debate the issue for a few more minutes.
“RUSA has shied away from controversy, from taking stances on political issues,” School of Arts and Sciences junior Tali Rasis said. “I can’t think of a more controversial international issue, or definitely among the top that is going on right now.”
Dialla Hamzeh, the PCRF University chapter’s treasurer, said the organization was upset to hear that students were opposed to helping the organization.
“We were actually shocked when we heard this, especially at Rutgers, because we are so diverse,” said Hamzeh, a School of Arts and Sciences junior. “We don’t think [any of the information] is substantial.”
Rasis said PCRF’s founder and President Stephen Sosebee had comments on his blog that indicated he and the PCRF are a partisan organization, which is not a group RUSA should support.
“He supports forceful resistance. That shows clearly [PCRF is] not a neutral group; they’re very much for one side,” she said. "That’s not something RUSA should be fighting [for].”
There were also allegations that the organization had ties with terrorist groups in the past because of their relationship with the Holy Land Foundation, which was brought up on charges in 2007 for funding Hamas, a terrorist group, said RUSA member Avi Scher, a School of Arts and Sciences sophomore.
“It’s the international organization I have a problem with, not the Rutgers chapter,” Rasis said.
But Ghadeer Hasan, president of the University chapter of the PCRF, said these accusations are false and did not come from substantial sources.
“I don’t think we should make a decision over a blog, just anything off the Internet that has no credibility at all,” said Hasan, a School of Arts and Sciences junior. “The PCRF works with the FBI, the treasury department, the Isreali embassy and the Egyptian embassy — none of which we would be able to do if we were funding terrorists or were linked to terrorists.”
She said the PCRF did work with the Holy Land Foundation many years ago, but its only relationship to the group was to help a child.
“Where is the controversy over the right of a child to health care?” Hasan said. “I don’t really see controversy over giving a child a second chance at life.”
RUSA is expected to consider the issue over the weekend and make a decision on Monday through an e-mail vote.
Updates will be posted on dailytargum.com as they become available.

¬— John S. Clyde contributed to this article

 


 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

24 comments

Reuven ben Chayim
Sun Nov 22 2009 16:37
I'll tell ya this. Just about ALL of you have been sponsoring a militant organization, which stockpiles guns, land-mines, atomic bombs(!), and various other means of doing harm to people, which always desires to get its way, and which has engaged in fighting. How is this so? Simple. Your sponsorship is involuntary; it's called "taxes", and the organization in question is the U.S. government. So why is this done? So we could have our way of life protected from OTHER militant organizations. Dog-eat-dog, heh?

memo to tea party folks: Taxes exist for a reason. Govt budgets exist for a reason.

Reuven ben Chayim
Sun Nov 22 2009 16:24
The problem is not the word "Palestine" but the suspicion some people have that what is supposed to be a charity might, in fact, be a front for terrorist organization. As for those suspected ties, the terrorists in question might have turned themselves into pillars of their community, much like any politician does, and so wound up having some ties to charities. That does not necessarily mean the terrorists are raiding the charity! As for the meal sign away, what's wrong with offering a choice of charities? Not everybody is comfortable with a charity mainly focused on someone else's people.

The ethnocentrism notwithstanding, the PCRF is probably a legitimate charity. That has nothing to do with WHO rightfully "owns" Eretz Yisrael/ Palestine (both groups are indigeneous, so this fight is kinda silly).

Anonymous
Sun Nov 22 2009 15:11
The PCRF does not give money. The money is spent on medical supplies and equipment.

The PCRF also provides medical care to children based on NEED, via an application process. No Israeli child has ever applied for aid. Additionally, Israel provides its children with free medical care, so...they have no NEED for it.

It's sad to see that even in this generation, you people have been raised to get caught up in your own prejudices and bigotry. Stop trying to undermine a humanitarian cause by turning it into a political issue.

Your name
Sun Nov 22 2009 15:00
"Anyone with sane and open mind, knows that maximum part of Palestine was given to Jewish population which was just about 4 % of total population.That was greatest catastrophe and mistake done ever in the history. Now these occupiers are preventing sufferers from getting even minimum food to survive. though Iranian president had called for wiping for Israel and world reacted with hysteria (just listening those words) , but it is zionists who are wiping the Palestinian community which obvious, but world is deaf dumb and blind. The Americans should wake up and prevent America from becoming full fledged war criminal and being shaped by Zionists and Neocons."

False. The Arabs were offered a more than fair partition of the land in 1947. The Jews accepted. The Arabs rejected it. The Arabs then invaded FIVE times and lost every single time. Egypt and Jordan relinquished control of Gaza and the West Bank. The so-called Gaza suffering is completely false. Hundreds of aid trucks enter the Strip every day as well as regular imports of food.

A recent report came out that stunted growth in children caused by malnutrition is half as much in Gaza as in any Arab country. The "palestinian" community is not being wiped out. It does not exist. It never existed. Get your facts straight.

Against inhumane propaganda
Sun Nov 22 2009 03:59
Anyone with sane and open mind, knows that maximum part of Palestine was given to Jewish population which was just about 4 % of total population.That was greatest catastrophe and mistake done ever in the history.
Now these occupiers are preventing sufferers from getting even minimum food to survive. though Iranian president had called for wiping for Israel and world reacted with hysteria (just listening those words) , but it is zionists who are wiping the Palestinian community which obvious, but world is deaf dumb and blind. The Americans should wake up and prevent America from becoming full fledged war criminal and being shaped by Zionists and Neocons.
David ben Yaacov
Sun Nov 22 2009 03:36
There is no "Palestine' so the issue is moot. It is our land, the homeland of the Jews for over 3500 years. That is fact. The Romans "renamed' Yehuda (Judea) "Palestine" from the Philistines who disappeared from history around 700 BCE. The Arabs are trespassers occupying Israel. Everybody in the world, in the UN are bamboozled by "Filastine" propaganda. You who say it is "racist:" to not give aid to terrorists, you are utter fools. You who actually think there is a "peace process" between the bloodthirsty Arabs who want to steal Eretz Yisrael, the Land of Israel have their heads in the sand. The so called "Filastines" if you've done ANY RESEARCH INTO CREDIBLE HISTORY are lying, two faced, barbaric, Islamist terrorists with innocent Israeli blood on their hands. Israel fights her enemies with one hand, holding back the other for . Idiotic Westerners who have absolutely no stake or relation to Israeli-Arab wars should keep their mouths shut..
Your name
Sat Nov 21 2009 21:45
united, if justice is to truly prevail, RUSA will strip PCRF as the swipe charity
2012
Sat Nov 21 2009 21:44
Anyone who educates themselves will know that the "palestinians" by definition are a militant group opposed to the existence of Israel. The word "palestinian" did not exist before 1967, or at least not before 1948. The founder of this group hates Jews and will do anything to undermine Israel. This group claims to help all children of the Middle East, but has no office in internationally-recognized Israel. It does not matter what health care system Israel has; the group's mission is a complete lie.

The hospitals and clinics built with the money from PCRF will be used to store weapons, as terrorist group Hamas is notorious for doing. Most people are unaware of this because they have no interest in the issue or do not want to believe it. Hamas also regularly steals aid and redistributes it as if it were its own. Recently they committed armed robbery to steal construction materials froma building site. I have no doubt they would steal the money we send.

In light of this, I hope RUSA will take precaution and find a safer and more respectable charity to donate to. If not, then the amount of swipes donated will drop substantially because no pro-Israel person will donate (however fair or unfair that is). Further, there will be organized discouragement of other people not to donate to potential terroristsp

United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Sat Nov 21 2009 14:46
Also, just to clarify, the allegations against the PCRF were raised by a small group of people. Not the entire RUSA. I believe by RUSA rules, it has to at least discuss the motion to reconsider if it is raised (I'm not exactly sure how it works).
I personally have faith that a good number of the RUSA members understand what the issue really is, and will at least take the time to look into the allegations more before voting. So I think they are trying to be fair. Let's give them a chance before we turn on them, because I think in the end, RUSA will allow justice to prevail, and not cower in the face of a few unfriendly, biased members.
Brook
Fri Nov 20 2009 23:03
Dear Chico,
Please actually read about what the PCRF. It does not send grain to the middle east. This is not about food, please get your facts straight
Thanks.
MB
Fri Nov 20 2009 18:58
***It is unbelievable that such a high level school, with an intelligent and diverse student body would even have a controversy such as this. The organization wants to HELP CHILDREN IN NEED and someone is trying to stop it. How does that sound? We are Americans and we help everyone despite their country, religion, race etc. America and Cuba are at odds, however, we provide asylum to their citizens when they enter America through its borders (they enter illegally, but do we throw them out? NO!). We are at odds with the Palestinian government, but that does not mean we should punish the children of that country who need our help. What is the reconsideration by RUSA being based on? A blog? I can go on the internet and write a blog on anything that I wish. That does not mean it is true. You don’t have to be a genius to know that. The FBI works WITH this organization. I am positive that the FBI has more validity in its investigation procedures than does RUSA. Is RUSA trying to say that the FBI is wrong? I can’t believe that this is going on. I am a proud Rutgers Alumni and this is unbelievable. When I was there the student body was UNITED when it came to helping others. Rutgers is known for having a diverse student body and an enormous amount of organizations that help all around the world. PLEASE do not embarrass my alma mater in front of the rest of the world by showing others that our student body is closed minded and divided. I hope RUSA makes the RIGHT decision or else I believe that further action should be taken in order to investigate the policies and procedures of RUSA by higher authority and I would be more than happy to assist in that not because I favor PCRF or because I disfavor RUSA, but because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO.*****
Lover, not a hater
Fri Nov 20 2009 14:14
It is only a couple of members of RUSA who have personal and religious vendetta against Palestine, not the entire assembly. People need to stop associating all Palestinians with a militant group. These couple of members are getting information from unreliable sources on the Internet known as "Jihad Watch" and "Islam Monitor" which are completely biased blogs with no creditability.
Rutgers Student '10
Fri Nov 20 2009 13:48
I am so disgusted by this obviously racist attack on Palestinians by members of RUSA. If this humanitarian aid group for Palestinian children gets denied access to funding because of "controversy," then groups on campus that support Israel should be rightfully denied access to funding too. I believe the state of Israel is guilty of war crimes, but I would never protest a humanitarian effort in Israel led by members of Rutgers. I was out there with all of my fellow students protesting the Westboro Baptist Church because they were spewing anti-semitic and homophobic speech. It's just very devestating to see that we were once united as a community in our understanding for respect for individuals from all backgrounds, and now we are not. The leaders of RUSA need to take a stand against bigotry or they should resign! I also think Hillel that organized the Days Without Hate campaign should take a stand against this.
Anonymous123
Fri Nov 20 2009 12:32
Jeremy--
Perhaps you could present valid sources and proof about your allegations instead of your superficial research before you start attacking the decisions of the council, the organization, and your own country and school.
I would like to commend RUSA for acknowledging the good things the organization is attempting to do.

Chico--
So you think it is fair to write an entire population of people because of the few you hear about in the news? Last I checked, one person or one group does not define a whole race or religion or population. We do not see every Palestinian blowing themselves to pieces. We see a militant group, not all Palestinians.
And I do not believe anyone could say the children are responsible for the things you accuse the "Palestinians" for.
Also, you are not skipping a meal to donate a swipe.
And not everybody needs thanks or praise in order to do a good deed.

anonymous
Fri Nov 20 2009 12:00
People are trying to make PCRF guilty though association. It is not uncommon for charitable organizations to work together for a common cause. In addition these allegations are based on fear and innuendo. This is not political issue but a humanitarian issue. Categorizing all charitable organizations that have ties to Palestinians as 'terrorist' is controversial and counter-productive to our goal of creating peace. The reason why there is so much uproar over a few people is because of a lack of trust. It is sad to see that helping children has now become a political issue just because of their ethnicity.
Your name
Fri Nov 20 2009 11:53
Why isn't the Targum allowing us to post any more comments? It tried submitting but it isn't working...let's try now...
Publius
Fri Nov 20 2009 11:15
The only ties they had with that group was a brief stint working together to provide medical care for a child. The allegations against Sosebee are paper thin. This is the diary entry I believe they are talking about:

[concerning seeing a crowd gather as he and his wife leave Ramallah]
"The defiant Hassidic man goes on shouting fearlessly in Hebrew and pointing to the sky like Malcolm X as we turn to leave. An old frail man from the Temple Mount group comes over carrying a rolled up Israeli flag and tries to hit him, but is held back by others. It is a feeble effort, but a good one for us to leave on. I feel inspired as we depart the Jewish Quarter.

"That man was so brave to stand there and shout such unpopular things," my wife says. He certainly made our trip down from Ramallah worth the hassle."

People like Jeremy are spouting rhetoric and continuing misperceptions that a little research could fix.

Jeremy
Fri Nov 20 2009 11:04
the PCRF has ties to the Holy Land Foundation, whose founding members are all serving life sentences in US Prisons for the largest domestic transfer of monetary funds to a terrorist organization, Hamas. The President, Stephen Sosebee was inspired by terroristic palestinians throwing rocks, swearing and inflicting pain against Israeli soldiers. It is an utter outrage that RUSA has the audacity to allow the only transfer of meal-swipes to an organization with such questionable associations. If this decision is not overturned they are traitors to the students at Rutgers, the people of New Jersey and worst of all the United States of America. Shame on you.
Concerned Student
Fri Nov 20 2009 10:46
I agree, I find it very hypocritical of students and their views. When Westboro Church was targeting the Rutgers Hillel and the Jewish Community, the entire student body got together and showed love and unity. We made a stand showing that Rutgers is AGAINST hate. Now by targeting Palestine Children Relief Fund, students are showing hate probably because it has the word "Palestine" in it. I thought we should be nonpartisan and show love? I am very disappointed Rutgers, I expected more out of us.
RU1992
Fri Nov 20 2009 10:40
Publius (1st comment) said it all. I'll resist the urge to block and copy, but not the urge to say "you got it 100%."






log out