College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Apathy stronger weapon than words

By BRIAN SADEJ

Print this article

Published: Thursday, October 22, 2009

Updated: Thursday, October 22, 2009

Apathy is a powerful weapon. It has halted social movements, won elections and silenced voices the world over. It is exactly the tool that must be used to silence hatred.
This is meant to be directed toward the University population that plans to meet the members of the Westboro Baptist Church in the streets outside of Rutgers Hillel at 8:45 a.m. on Oct. 28. My best advice: stay at home. This radical hate group is obviously not welcome on the University campus. The only problem is that they do legally have the right to be here and make their voice heard at that site on that day. There is legally nothing that can be done to stop this event from happening. They followed the procedures to the T, as they always do, in order to ensure that they get their time in the spotlight.
We cannot silence their voices, but as a collective unit we can greatly minimize their audience. Groups like the Westboro Baptist Church have no political goals or policy objectives that they hope to achieve by peacefully protesting around the country; they simply wish to legally stand on the street corner and scream their messages of hatred to the world in order to get a reaction from the immediate vicinity. Why would they do this? Media Coverage. They want to be interviewed by Fox, NBC and CBS and have their 15 minutes of fame all around the country. They want to be seen as the devilish figures that most Americans are embarrassed about so that they can spread their message to a global audience.
What do media sources want? A good story, and what better story would there be then thousands of University students meeting 10 members of a radical group to denounce their dogma? If no one shows up to the “protest” of the church, the story is not as interesting and the groups’ action begin to fade into obscurity. This is the most powerful weapon that we have, to force them to fade into obscurity by not reacting.
This group knows what they are doing, that is why they chose the University, one of the most liberal universities in the country, as the site for their next protest. They know we vehemently oppose their ideas and will react exactly the way they want us to. They want us to gather all our friends and family and meet them on the steps of Hillel. Shortly after they meet us, they will meet the news crews coming in to check the latest story, which will display the events of New Brunswick to the entire world. They want us to react irrationally and to think with our hearts instead of our heads so that they can achieve what they want.
This University was targeted specifically and is a calculated movement by a group that is getting less attention as time drags on. This is a chance for their small, radical chapter to step into the spotlight, if only for a few more moments.
Our strategy should be one of general apathy, to avoid the counter-protest and continue on with our day as if it was no different then any other day. This overall should not be that difficult, since most University students do not get up before 11 a.m. Stay in bed, study for exams, go to the gym, eat a fat sandwich, go on Facebook, do absolutely anything other then organizing and staging a counter protest to their legal protest.
If we ignore this group and let them pass peacefully through the city unimpeded, the news sources will not care and we will deal the Westboro Baptist Church a more powerful defeat than we could do standing across the street from them, yelling at them and saying they should go home. They are not welcome here and we know it, so do not give them a place at the University. Apathy is a powerful weapon — let’s utilize it for good.

Brian Sadej is a Rutgers College senior majoring in political science and criminal justice.  

Comments

7 comments
Melinda Holley
Fri Oct 23 2009 08:53
This idea would work if everyone shunned or ignored the WBC protest. However, the media will be there. People will be walking or driving where they are protesting. So staying away won't work. It's admirable to think that sensible civilized people could just ignore WBC. But if you look at their history, that doesn't work either. They simply escalate in their selection of targets. When protesting at high schools don't work, they'll start protesting at middle schools, then elementary schools, and eventually be protesting at nurseries and day care centers. It's said that when the barbarians were at the gates of Rome, the esteemed Roman senators arrayed themselves in their finest garments and retired to the Senate so they could reason with the barbarians when they entered. The barbarians came in and promptly beheaded the esteemed Roman senators. Discussion over. The point? You can't reason with someone who doesn't want to listen. WBC doesn't want to listen. If people stay to one side and say (or do) nothing, they are giving tacit approval of WBC's actions. Show up at their protests. Beat them at their own game. If they require a permit to protest, find out the terms, conditions, and restrictions of that permit. Time their protest. If they go over the time limit or stray from their designated areas (even carrying signs to and from their permitted protest area), they're in violation of the law and should be held accountable. If the police don't arrest them for their violations, effect a citizen's arrest. When they start chanting and singing, chant and sing right back. Drown them out. Use boom boxes. Get a copy of Kate Smith's recording of "God Bless America". That'll drown them out. If it doesn't, try AC/DC's Highway to Hell. The point is, WBC does what they do because no one wants to meet them on their own ground and give them a taste of what they give to others.
Melinda Holley
Fri Oct 23 2009 08:52
This idea would work if everyone shunned or ignored the WBC protest. However, the media will be there. People will be walking or driving where they are protesting. So staying away won't work. It's admirable to think that sensible civilized people could just ignore WBC. But if you look at their history, that doesn't work either. They simply escalate in their selection of targets. When protesting at high schools don't work, they'll start protesting at middle schools, then elementary schools, and eventually be protesting at nurseries and day care centers. It's said that when the barbarians were at the gates of Rome, the esteemed Roman senators arrayed themselves in their finest garments and retired to the Senate so they could reason with the barbarians when they entered. The barbarians came in and promptly beheaded the esteemed Roman senators. Discussion over. The point? You can't reason with someone who doesn't want to listen. WBC doesn't want to listen. If people stay to one side and say (or do) nothing, they are giving tacit approval of WBC's actions. Show up at their protests. Beat them at their own game. If they require a permit to protest, find out the terms, conditions, and restrictions of that permit. Time their protest. If they go over the time limit or stray from their designated areas (even carrying signs to and from their permitted protest area), they're in violation of the law and should be held accountable. If the police don't arrest them for their violations, effect a citizen's arrest. When they start chanting and singing, chant and sing right back. Drown them out. Use boom boxes. Get a copy of Kate Smith's recording of "God Bless America". That'll drown them out. If it doesn't, try AC/DC's Highway to Hell. The point is, WBC does what they do because no one wants to meet them on their own ground and give them a taste of what they give to others.
Quintilian
Fri Oct 23 2009 07:23
This is another case of a Targum columnist who has zero control over his prose style. It is shaming to the university.

His basic idea is okay: a powerful way to counter the attempts of hate groups to draw attention to themselves is simply to ignore them. If you don't take the bait, they leave with an empty trap.

But "apathy" is a wrong -- the wrongest, one might say -- word. Apathy is a simply lack of feeling or emotion about something: one simply has no reaction at all. This columnist is trying to suggest something much more like a boycott, which would signal strong OPPOSITION to what this group is trying to do. Strong opposition (moral repugnance at what the group stands for) is not a lack of feeling or emotion. Quite the reverse.

Something has to be done about the quality of Targum columns and editorials. They are a disgrace to the university. Hate groups come and go. Semi-literacy -- especially when publicly exposed to anyone who picks up a student newspaper or goes on the Web to check the Targum -- shames Rutgers in the eyes of the outside world. At the very least, would it be possible for the Targum buy dictionaries for its columnists? Simply taking 20 seconds to look up "apathy" in Webster's Third Collegiate would have prevented this particular disaster.

Christine R.
Fri Oct 23 2009 07:13
I don't doubt that they have the right to protest. Clearly, they are protected under the 1st Amendment. My concern is the impact they will have on impressionable children who cannot protest, etc. Kids (and the group is targeting inner-city youth as part of its agenda) need to see that the filth this organization is spreading is unacceptable in the community. The counterprotest needs to be loud and very visible. So far, though, I have not seen any individual or group at Rutgers come forward to address this. That is sad.
Elon Weintraub
Fri Oct 23 2009 01:07
Christine, no one wants them to go the High School, but again they have the right to protest.
DE Teodoru
Thu Oct 22 2009 23:12
It’s not apathy but cowardice. What have any of us learned at Rutgers that can help us deal with what your cartoon about Obama and deficits tells us? Fear dominates, for you don't have to be a polisci major to note the possible scenario of the Great White Mob rising violently and a Petraeus-McChrystal military regime "saving" America from "disorder." Bush set the bar so low that even mediocrities like Petraeus and McChrystal (the man who brought you the Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman cover-ups of US friendly-fire screw-ups) can step over it. Read MILITARY REVIEW and take note of the "D+" type papers published there by supposed "thinking- level" officers on our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. How did they get to dominate even Obama? Because cowardly academia held no teach-ins, no meaningful dialogue or debates to test the critical judgment of those who rule our kids in combat. Rutgers Profs ought to be ashamed of their cowered silence. If there had been a draft their students would have forced them to promote dialogue as had draft-eligible Rutgers students in the 60s. Cowering bald-headed profs of today once were the idealists of the 60s. What ever happened to them that they so lack testicular fortitude?
Christine R.
Thu Oct 22 2009 23:06
This is not a possibility. People will show up to counter them. Better to have some plan in place than nothing. Also, CAN SOMEONE GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THIS GROUP GOING TO THE HIGH SCHOOL? I'm not a CAPS fanatic at all, but the fact that no one cares that these idiots will be in front of New Brunswick HS when the kids arrive is extremely disturbing. They will be exposing children (who do not have the ability to counter) to their hatred right when the school day begins. Does anyone care? Or are the students just 'those people' who don't matter? I'm starting to see bigotry on both ends of this mess.






log out