College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Executive recognition or undeserved merit

Editorial

By The Daily Targum

Print this article

Published: Monday, November 9, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 9, 2009

The question of diversity has been raised many times throughout American history. The topics have ranged from desegregation to fair opportunities in the educational spheres. While the University has had a tendency of relying on diversity to uphold a certain reputation, one group has been a minority among minorities, and that is the Native American.
In recent news, the ever-popular President Barack Obama has addressed the issue of Native American underrepresentation. This focus on American Indians was made a priority on Thursday at the White House Tribal Nations Conference at the Department of the Interior in Washington. According to USA Today, this meeting, a first since 1994, aimed to redeem broken promises made to certain tribes. Along with these broken promises, the meeting attempted to correct the agenda of a very busy man. The president’s compassionate talks of Native American struggle seemed to foolishly make a comparison between his childhood and the lives of people who for years have been maliciously targeted by the new settlers.
While this meeting of seemingly immediate importance might have been for the morality of the matter, there are underlying motives for action. Truly, the Native American matter had to be addressed at some point, considering that many tribes do not have running water or have insufficient educational facilities, but the time was chosen more for its political importance rather than social.
This initiative serves to raise awareness of issues stretching back to the founding of this nation. The reality of things, however, might be much deeper than apportioning $1 billion for Native American tribes. If one were to look away from the limelight in which Obama stands, he would find that a majority of our president’s actions are carried out in a very public way. This year’s Nobel Prize winner brings about an image of himself that is undoubtedly liked. In this continuous race for re-election, Obama has traveled more than any other president in American history, visited many countries, spoken with many world leaders and has recently taken it upon his image to face another potentially beneficial situation. According to the chief executive, his administration has already aided Native Americans through the $787 billion stimulus, of which the funds for Indians were allocated accordingly: $100 million for job creation within tribal communities, $500 million for the Indian Health Service and nearly $500 million for various education, college and school construction programs.
The question that arises from this situation is, why now? In this economically unstable time, how does this benefit the economic system? Those $1.1 billion dollars given to closed communities and non-consumer tribes do not circulate in the system as they are meant to, thus are not an integral part of the financial reconstruction of the nation. The sad truth is that this money given to the Native Americans serves no purpose other than a medium for the president’s fluctuating rating. This financial help could have come in several months or several years ago, but it has come now as it serves its purpose in presenting Obama in a certain humanitarian way. An aid of these proportions may have been needed, but it was certainly another vehicle for Obama’s re-election.
The president said at this meeting, “I know what it means to feel ignored and forgotten, and what it means to struggle.” He also referred to himself as an “outsider” as he attempted to appeal to these truly overlooked peoples. Obama’s attempt at comparison between himself and an impoverished minority shows the true colors of this meeting. While this grouping of our president and Native Americans make light of Obama’s childhood struggle, it seems to be a bit far-fetched. A compassionate talk of struggle and historical underrepresentation brought a certain feeling of amiability between the president and tribe leaders. This underlying sense of humanitarian success puts another merit on Obama’s resume.
The ultimate result of this tribal meeting was an executive order by the president. He signed an order requiring all cabinet members to provide plans for consulting Native American tribes. In addition, he pledged to consider their needs in instances of moving forward on education and health care programs. About a decade ago, President Bill Clinton issued a similar order, but Indian leaders believe that it has done very little. Their optimism about Obama, however, stays. Perhaps it is their unbreakable will to believe in any executive of the United States who is willing to make any plans of aiding Indian tribes. Why would Obama’s word mean more than the one of Clinton? Do racial segregation and difficulties during his childhood make Obama a trustworthy vessel of much-needed reform when it comes to Native Americans?
Undoubtedly, President Obama’s election was of epic proportions and his acts seem to aid the bourgeois population of the United States. The face of diversity and acceptance has done little, however, when it comes to social reform and international affairs. His steps toward benefiting another important group of American history may be methods for future political campaigns. It is doubtful that these talks of education and health improvement of these closed societies will do anything but bring certain people to certain places. Perhaps a Nobel Prize will do just that. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

DC
Mon Nov 23 2009 16:33
I have to say that while this piece is not well written, I agree with its underlying line of questioning of the self-serving motives behind Obama's latest pet project. Unfortunately, I am also Native. I think anytime is a good time for the U.S. to take a hard look at what's happening on the reservations. I don't think funneling money into odd projects without infrastructure in place to see them through is a wise idea. If I were to do something about the state of tribes (and their economy, because hey, we all spend our money in off-reservation stores), I would do something about education. I have a younger brother who graduated from high school and still lives there. I worry about the fact that there are no jobs on the reservation. It is also true that tribal government is not known for its stellar ethics and there's always the obstacle of in-fighting and warring factions drawn along family lines. At the end of the day, I do not believe that the way of living in the broader common culture is superior--I have a college degree, but living in the city is rather a hollow experience and not much to aspire to, honestly. Home is the reservation, and it's sacred.
Ted
Thu Nov 19 2009 09:24
So a program of stimulus for a targeted population is no good because it does not help other populations? I suppose that means you think the targeted population is not worth helping? Stimulus road projects in some county of some state doesn't help anyone not living or working there, either. Are those bad also? Lammátic!
len
Mon Nov 16 2009 13:50
I would appreciate the writer to place their name at the end of this article. Indians are on the move and opinions are as different as each individual ndn, or tribe. we are not the same as we were in the 17th, 18th, 19th century, each has "their" truth to express. I have the freedom to disagree, or not with opines from anyone, ndn, non ndn alike. We cannot avoid looking at the "man" in the mirror and deciding, "to thine own self be true" we've fought to hard to NOT express ourselves!
Michelina
Thu Nov 12 2009 21:23
This editorial reads like a bad dime store novel. First, learn to write, then learn to edit. Pick up Strunk and White: the Elements of Style, or the Chicago Manual of Style. How did this "piece" make it past the editors?! How embarrassing.
Dustin Lewis
Thu Nov 12 2009 00:14
Wow, Marty, such a negative point of view about your own people. Have you ever thought about trying to change the way things are done with YOUR tribe? I hate to tell you this but not every tribe operates in that manner. Let me repeat, not all tribal governments are corrupt and not all tribal council members are corrupt. Stop the stereotyping.
Marty
Wed Nov 11 2009 16:06
I think the editoral was correct in that this was an "Opinion." While it be true the United States Government does owe the Indian People compensation for stolen lands, mineral rights, water rights, this Government has 638 Contract Grant Funding Programs in which the Tribal Government uses to operate services for the Tribal Members. The true fact is that the Tribal Government is only perhaps 14 people who employ nepotism to which only their Family benefits. Our Reservation has an 80% Unemployment rate. There are no services based on the top Tribal Government has misused Federal Funding for their own benefit. You have some people earning $80,000 dollars while the other 80% receive "nothing." Now we speak of Stimulus Funding awarded to Tribes but in all honesty this money will be sucked up by the top 14 in power and thus divided among them selves. To the basic Indian, they have become accustomed to think "Never had it never worry." This belief furthers the concept its legal for the top leaders to steal from Government Funding and it is since there is a Government to Government relationship and the tribal members elected the Tribal Council Members, its sanctioned. When you give federal funds to Indian tribes, you just give it to thieves. This is a reality from a Native so I say the editor was correct. The bottom line is" Why would you build a community in the desert where there is no employment opportunity, no stores, no nothing?"
MNAttorney
Wed Nov 11 2009 15:57
What an interesting collection of flawed and unresearched arguments! Perhaps some of that stimulus money for education should go to the area from which the author of this editorial hails.
cindy adrienne quashie, Garifuna (Akan, Carib, Norse, Celtic)
Wed Nov 11 2009 14:53
you dayum right We don't deserve economic stilmulus, that is for the sick, poor tired and hungry who owe Us 517 years of back rent, penalties on bounced checks, unauthorized and mis-usage of Natural resources fees, just to name a few of the items, detailed with time stamps, on the invoice for which payment is 517 years past due.

As far as 'closed community' is that england-dish for concentration camp reservations?

'closed community' is that england-dish for remembering to teach Ourselves the learning that Alabama is A People and the 'sambo' propaganda was a deliberate attempt for the rueters forefathers to defy their own 'church' decree and not return Our Land to Us, The Indigenous CareTakers of same, who by then were also ONE BLOOD with Imported Africans, Asian and European slaves here i The Americas?

It is my eternal prayer that our Societies and Communities remain closed. Last time we opened the doors, Our NewBorns were gifted blankets woven from cancer and aids.

Elise in NH
Wed Nov 11 2009 14:28
An editorial without a writer...at least, not one who was willing to claim this "work".

What a cowardly drive-by insult, on so many levels.

For shame, Rutgers...

Facts, please
Wed Nov 11 2009 11:32
Most studies show that reservation economies have significant impact in their entire regions. "Closed communities," they are not. This is a horribly uneducated editorial.
Dustin Lewis
Wed Nov 11 2009 02:14
So, who wrote this piece of uneducated rubbish?

I wouldn't put my name on it either.

Curt Mangino
Tue Nov 10 2009 14:55
Yeah, dumb editorial. 1) the tribal funds were included in the Recovery Act and were largely obligated by mid-summer, just like all the other Recovery Act funding; 2) Indian reservations have a significant positive impact on their neighboring economies, through jobs, contracts, spending, infrastructure development;
Johnny Flynn
Tue Nov 10 2009 14:18
New Jersey is a long way from Indian Country, but as a university it is appalling that someone has so obviously failed to educate themselves about Indian communities. We pay the same taxes as everyone else with the exception of local property taxes. But there are programs which the feds fund, based on treaty obligations, which make up the cost of educating Indian children. Editors of the Daily Targum should realize that reservations are not on the moon, where there are no 7-11's or Walmarts. And consumer societies have just been hit with a meteor of epic proportions. Extinction is ahead for spirituality through the church of the SUV and recognizing the value of tribal societies benefit everyone. When someone sent me the link to this article with a tease of the content, I thought it was some right-wing KKK rag next to a reservation. Turns out it was a top tier university on the East Coast. Shame on you boneheads for knowing not enough about Indians to dance on the head of a pin.
Your name
Tue Nov 10 2009 14:18
Inasmuch as very little funds stay on the reservations, any stimulus funds to the reservation will end up on the general economy. Payments to the IHS or schools are not retained on the reservation. Salary payments are spent usually in the border towns, whose economy is basically non-native. Payment for infrastructure rapidly find there way rapidly to the non-native economy as there are few native construction companies.

The is no rationale to further marginalize the native population by stating that they do not contribute to the economy.

akeeyata
Tue Nov 10 2009 13:46
Sometimes you come across leaders that recognize the wrongs in the world and actually are motivated by compassion and humility to correct or make good on reversing those wrongs.
Ben ALex
Tue Nov 10 2009 13:04
"Closed societies?" Are you joking? There are no borders on our reservations that exclude other American people. What a blatantly ignorant view. I live in a community of Americans who are divided by economic hardships, not their race.
In fact, you would have a hard time finding an Indian community that wasn't mixed-race anymore. I have half black cousins, Asian cousins, and white cousins. If that's a "closed society," then I'm missing your point.

We are, as Native people, entitled to Federal dollars that will help us combat the ills of a crippled American economy. We deserve to be treated equally, just like any American community. Do you think we are not Americans? Native people have been fighting in the military since before we were even American citizens. As a race, we have the highest percentage of volunteers in the armed forces. Our Navajo Code Talkers helped win World War 2. Stop being racist. Your views are frivolous, and uneducated. It sounds like you've been watching too many Hollywood Indian movies, and let that propaganda define your view of the world. You do not know our real story. Do your homework before you write about us.

When money is provided for our Indigenous communities, it ALWAYS helps everyone in the area. Not just Indians. The money is circulated through contracts to non-Indian companies, local Law enforcement, fire departments, and many other under funded programs.

Shame on you. I can't believe some of my cousins actually died in Iraq, so you could have the freedom of speech to write this garbage.
Happy Veterans Day to us, I guess. Right?







log out