293 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
A ghost of the Cold War is walking again. Masha Gessen “wakens up the dead” to appeal to sensibilities of those who are more inclined to celebrate an analogy between the Russian and Soviet states and then question the validity or origins of such a projection. In her recent opinion piece “Did the Soviet Union Really End?” she declares contemporary Russia to be an heir to a Soviet totalitarianism. She brings back this dramatic, half-century-old cliche, to mobilize Americans again against the old enemy.
Who would think that an individual, from the left or right, would have
the audacity to, in 2016, use ignorant arguments to reduce the demands made by
the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement to old clichés we have come to expect out of
the mouths of Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh? Prior to Monday's fallacy-filled
opinion piece by one Aviv Khavich, it would not have been me.
Almost six years ago, the 2010 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR) enacted substantial changes to the federal Child Nutrition Programs the bill authorizes, including the beloved National School Lunch Program (NSLP). Among several noteworthy provisions, CNR 2010 set strengthened science-based nutritional standards for school meals, expanded school breakfast and summer food service programs, and laid the foundation for a healthier future for all children through the Farm to School Program, school garden grants program and nutrition education requirement.
Like many passionate Bernie Sanders supporters and self-proclaimed Bernie-or-Busters around the country, I am proud to consider myself a part of Sen. Sanders's (I-Vt.) remarkable Democratic primary campaign. Sanders's fight for social, economic, racial and environmental justice has brought millions of young voters into the political process. They all shared one thing in common: hope for a better future. He brought awareness to issues such as corruption, injustice and environmental negligence, and advocated for “radical changes” such as single-payer healthcare and free college tuition.
This year, Rutgers University celebrates the 250th anniversary of its founding. One of the most interesting episodes in its long and sometimes distinguished history has been the controversy surrounding big-time sports. Until recently, most alumni would have agreed with Milton Friedman, Class of 1932, that sports were “an important but strictly minor aspect of Rutgers education.” But beginning with the presidency of Edward Bloustein (1971-1989), influential members of the Board of Governors decided to transform and enlarge the athletics program. No longer would Rutgers compete with its traditional rivals in the Patriot and Ivy leagues. It would become a major sports school, like the large public universities of the Midwest. This goal was achieved in 2014 when Rutgers became a member of the Big Ten. Not everyone regarded this as a success story. For 20 years and more, a vocal and articulate group of students, alumni and faculty had argued that Rutgers should retain its tradition of participatory athletics. They lost the argument, but their questions and concerns remain important for the future of the school. I believe that in time the better argument will prevail and that Rutgers will be forced to abandon big-time sports.
Americans don’t like to be misled, but we frequently are. Republicans, aided by a sizable amount of Democrats, mislead us into the Iraq War in the name of national security. We all know now is — some thousands of vets’ lives and a trillion dollars later — that there were never any weapons of mass destruction, and that Saddam had nothing to do with Sept. 11, 2001.
Student safety is a priority for all of the Rutgers community, and when a curriculum requires hands-on activity with hazardous materials, equipment and techniques, no effort should be spared.
Nov. 8, 2016, is finally right around the corner. For two years now, Rutgers for Hillary has been organizing students and voters in support of Hillary Clinton and other Democrats running to serve America. This semester, we’ve finally reached the home stretch, and we’re not slowing down. Here are our plans for the fall.
Dear Mr. President:
Last November, I published a commentary on the double standards and hypocrisy of the No Rice protests. I was then criticized for being too preemptive, and supposedly misrepresenting them, which are accusations that I believe are facetious and exemplify the double standards employed by No Rice. I debated waiting before penning this commentary — perhaps No Rice would act after all. However, I realized delay allows the inconsistency between their actions against Dr. Rice and inaction toward President Obama.
The past four years at Rutgers University have been enormously influential and have given me the opportunity to dedicate my time to an area of study that I am very passionate about. The Department of American Studies has provided me with invaluable mentors who taught me to pursue the things in life that I truly love. Many of the classes I have taken during my academic career allowed me to explore the possibility of seeking a career involving historic preservation. I have always been an eager student of history, and I want my future to consist of exploring and preserving sites, objects and information of great value to this country's history.
In response to “Is Obama really best Rutgers 250th commencement speaker?”:
Recently, Ms. Becky Ratero supplied the Targum with a fascinating intellectual exercise on the possibility of replacing global capitalism with communism. According to Ms. Ratero, the horrors of capitalism cannot be expunged intrinsically. A revolution — a complete, and total revolution — is required. Why? From Ms. Ratero herself: “The horrors of this system include the destruction and plunder of the environment, from drilling in the Arctic to deforestation in the Amazon, a pharmaceutical industry that only cares about profit, the mass production of consumer goods through sweatshop labor around the world, drone warfare that's directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on.”
In response to “Socialism’s failures demonstrate capitalism’s superiority”:
I first became aware of tensions between graduating students from the three Rutgers campuses Wednesday morning when reading a post on the Rutgers Class of 2016 Facebook page that garnered around 650 "likes," explaining Newark and Camden students shouldn’t attend this year’s commencement featuring President Barack Obama as the primary speaker because they didn’t have the New Brunswick experience and can’t call this place home. After my initial euphoria that the High Point Solutions Stadium would be filled to capacity at least once in its life, allowing me to delude myself (if only for a moment) that the recent 10,000-seat expansion wasn’t a complete waste of $102 million, I was angered.
It is the evening on the Nov. 8, 2016, and the news finally hits. The “winner” of the presidential electoral vote is … Johnny Politician. Millions of Americans gasp. Thousands of Americans start crying. A good number projectile vomit onto their dinner plate. And even a couple drop dead from information overload. How could this be? How did that person win? How can I ever go on? Is life worth living anymore? Why can’t I ever get what I want?
Populists, politicians who attempt to appeal to the interests of average citizens, are dramatically weaker candidates for political office than they make themselves out to be. Without examining the nuances of contemporary issues, populists present themselves as "Washington Outsiders" who seek power in order to remedy the fears, desires and grievances of ordinary people. Unfortunately, the populist rhetoric by prominent members of the Democratic and Republican parties have permeated America’s national dialogue such that raw emotions alone dominate the open marketplace of ideas we all cherish.
When I was a sophomore, The Daily Targum sent me to cover a story — my first. It was a lecture given by an organization called Rutgers Community Action, and the story I wrote, running about 400 words, was published a couple of days later. I still have it. It reminds me how far I have come and of the early training Targum provided that continues to nourish my career. I now work as an editor at The New York Times, after a long career there reporting on New York, the southwestern United States and Latin America (and having worked at several other newspapers). None of this would have been possible without the Targum. I am truly grateful and hope the Rutgers community recognizes the vital institution that the Targum is, not only for holding the University accountable, but for training future generations to do the same in the outside world.
In Rutgers' 250 years of rich academic excellence, students of all walks of life have had the privilege of being a part of a historic research institution. Public state universities play a key role in society by creating opportunities for those who are under-privileged or those who took a little longer than expected to show their brilliance, and did not have the well-rounded attributes as early in life as the students who received Ivy League acceptances.
Six years out of college and I can say without hesitation, The Daily Targum was instrumental to jump-starting my journalism career and empowering me with the skills and knowledge I needed to succeed. I learned lessons while working at the nation’s second-oldest college newspaper that I use continually in my day-to-day job.