U. research methods should be cruelty-free
Letter to the Editor
I was happy to see the Targum publish an op-ed by an alumna on the cruelty and ineffectiveness of experiments on animals, including at Rutgers.
Each year in the United States, around 100 million animals — including rats, mice, dogs, cats, rabbits and monkeys — are tormented in laboratories where they are confined to small, barren cages, cut into, poisoned, addicted to drugs, infected with diseases and killed.
At Rutgers, experimenters examining sepsis burned rats by placing them in scalding hot water and cut into them before killing and dissecting them. In another experiment, experimenters put mustard gas into rabbits’ eyes and later killed them and removed their eyes.
In experiments like these, pain relievers aren’t required nor are the use of more effective non-animal alternatives. And the majority of animals in laboratories — including mice and rats — are not even protected by the only federal law concerning the treatment of animals in laboratories.
Fortunately, more and more scientists are now using faster, cheaper and superior non-animal research methods like organs-on-chips — first developed at Harvard — that use human cells and tissues to study diseases and test treatments.
It’s time Rutgers fully embraces these cutting-edge, animal-free research methods and leave behind cruel and antiquated experiments on animals.
Ngoc Kim is a School of Environmental and Biological Sciences junior majoring in ecology, evolution and natural resources. She is president of the Rutgers Veg Society.
YOUR VOICE | The Daily Targum welcomes submissions from all readers. Due to space limitations in our print newspaper, letters to the editor must not exceed 500 words. Guest columns and commentaries must be between 700 and 850 words. All authors must include their name, phone number, class year and college affiliation or department to be considered for publication. Please submit via email to email@example.com by 4 p.m. to be considered for the following day’s publication. Columns, cartoons and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of the Targum Publishing Company or its staff.